How Ukraine and America Evaporate

President Zelensky’s recent visit to America suggests that Ukrainians do not appreciate conservatives in Congress.  The Ukrainians either do not know or intentionally ignore the right side of the aisle and enthusiastically work solely with left-wingers in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere.

However, the truth is that the United States federal government has no money.  American leftists devoted all the money to encouraging a multi-million invasion on our southern border; implementing unprofitable, wasteful “green” technologies; and nurturing woke, feminized, toothless military (and, in part, the general population).

The United States federal government has to borrow money from future generations of Americans to survive the present.  Allocating money to Ukraine automatically degrades young Americans’ prospects for a good life.  Sad to say, American money is depleted; what the outside world sees is merely a shell of former American glory.

Besides, the exact expenditure of American taxpayers’ money remains unknown to everyone (it applies not to just the Ukrainian case).  Yes, the White House directs a portion of American taxpayers’ money toward various weapons systems observable in the combat zone.  However, the public is unaware of how significant that segment is.  What about the money we do not see on the battlefield?  Who controls the feedback loop from the American Treasury to Ukraine and back to the Democrat operatives, including the “big guy”?  What is the rate of return on the money funneled into the Ukraine-enabled left-wing patronage machine?

If Ukraine accepts American funds, it must accept traditional American accounting practices, with mandatory periodic financial audits.  Unfortunately, the Biden clique, along with the Democratic National Committee (DNC) plankton, does things to remind everybody of Biden’s lucrative deals in China, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and here and there.  The Biden administration blocks all efforts to implement even rudimentary accountability.

That leads us toward the loudest issue, at least from the American perspective: the catapulting of Ukraine into the DNC client state.

History demonstrates that a political party could have a satellite military force that bypasses the official military chain of command.  These legions report exclusively to party bosses.  For example, the Nazis had their military branch, the SS, outside the Wehrmacht.  Putin’s party army, Rosgvardia, is not answerable to the Russian Ministry of Defense, either.  While these examples are well known, history has never witnessed a political party forming not its military offshoot, but a client state.  It looks as though Ukraine constitutes itself as the first state on a short leash by a foreign political party: the Democrat Party of America.

In the past, the Democrat Party successfully attempted to establish party-aligned military or quasi-military wings.  Recall the KKK, Antifa, numerous “Occupy” movements, and BLM thugs.  Now, a supposed sovereign country, Ukraine, has willingly submitted itself to Democrat party serfdom, along with a carefully established and well oiled money-laundering conveyor.

The deliberate weakening of the United States and Russia by their respective presidents mandates prolonged, bloody trench warfare.  That is why neither the United States, NATO allies, nor Russia is rushing.  China’s Politburo, directly or indirectly, demanded the piecemeal delivery of armaments to Ukraine.  Everyone on the left side of the political spectrum stays committed to the plan.

The world — not to mention Ukrainians — must understand that the de-Ukrainization of Ukraine at the hands of Russian revanchists is just a sideshow.  This bitter truth is hard to swallow, but the main event is the de-Americanization of America and the de-Russification of Russia by Chinese communists.  The end of bloodshed may reside well outside the kill zone that separates the defender and the aggressor.

Conservatives worldwide are traditionally against war (any war, by the way).  Biden’s political opponents have an entirely distinct vision of the situation.  They prefer a one-time delivery of overwhelming military might to expel Russian invaders for good and generate revenue by rebuilding Ukraine after that.  For instance, the pre-woke military establishment, per General McMaster, considers 30 Abrams tanks for Ukraine laughable and advocates for 300 as a minimum.

However, Donald Trump, one of the conservative movement’s leaders, is persona non grata in Ukraine.

Regrettably, the “Russia, Russia, Russia” hoax has warped minds on both sides of the Atlantic.  Ukrainian society continues to view Trump as a Kremlin agent.  Ukrainians contributed significantly to the deception.  Recall that the DNC’s squadron to dig dirt on Trump during the 2016 election cycle headquarters was at the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, D.C.  Since then, Ukraine elected a new president, Zelensky, who refused to honor Trump’s call to help root out Biden clan corruption.  That paved the way for Trump’s first impeachment.

The irony is that Trump is the only politician who can realistically halt the largest shooting war in Europe since World War II.  Stop quickly — and, as such, ruin leftists’ endgame.  Almost everyone wants more weapons for Ukraine, but Trump keeps his eyes on the strategic rather than tactical goal.  From his perspective, the objective is not to arm Ukraine, but to stop the bloodshed.  Trump has tools at his disposal that operatives in the bowels of the DNC (or Ukrainians, for that matter) cannot foresee.

To illustrate, Trump-47 could declare the removal of the American nuclear arsenal from Japan and its relocation to Taiwan — complemented with implicit permission for Japan to acquire its own nuclear weapons.

Such a move would shake the leftist endeavors for World Domination because China would suddenly have to deal with nuclear-armed Japan.  Japanese scientists will complete their Manhattan Project in less time than the American one.  In a few years, China will face the possibility of losing Taiwan — probably forever.  Also, China’s world dominance fantasies will evaporate (also forever) because China understands that it can negotiate with nuclear America but not with nuclear Japan.

Basically, Trump would make China the offer it could not refuse: keep the status quo — on the condition of ordering its vassal state, Russia, to withdraw from Ukraine — or gravely jeopardize the whole Mao ideological experiment.

Americans, especially conservative Americans, respect Ukraine’s national hero Stepan Bandera and his WWII-era Ukrainian nationalism while detesting his left-wing, proto-fascist ideology.  In return, Americans expect Ukrainians to respect American nationalism.  Ukrainians cannot count on sympathy from American conservatives for their cause to surpass American nationalism.  True nationalism does not come at the expense of somebody else’s.

The Ukrainian government must not hire a disgraced (now suspended) American transgender as the Ukrainian army spokesman.  Ukrainians must not offer the ambassador position to a tasteless promoter of satanic rituals.  The president of Ukraine must not weaponize science by stating that “humanity is failing on its climate policy objectives” while begging for money at the United Nations.  Picking up an economic fight with Ukraine’s most staunch supporter, conservative Poland, is ludicrous.

On the contrary, the young nation that fights for its existence must look beyond its nose and choose friends and enemies wisely.

[Originally published at American Thinker]

The World Revolution and the Russo-Ukrainian War

Since the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine started the practice of de-Stalinization, de-Leninization, and comprehensive de-communization. In the process, it acquired many friends, non-friends, and enemies. Naturally, all of them showed their colors in the Russo-Ukrainian War.

A part of the Left embraces Ukraine’s cause because it makes them anti-Russia—the theme they cannot vacate from following the “Trump is Putin’s agent” hoax. They invested exorbitant political capital in the anti-Trump “Russia-Russia-Russia” frenzy.

A portion of conservatives support Ukraine because it traditionally backs the independence of legitimate nations, such as Israel or Taiwan.

Many on the Left reject Ukraine’s sovereignty because they cannot forgive Ukraine for dismantling and emblematically throwing in the trash can communist symbols, statues, and worldviews.

Some conservatives ignore Ukraine’s plea for help because, in their view, their own country’s troubles are exponentially more critical than the problems of the territory somewhere in Eastern Europe. Besides, it occupies the world’s leading position in corruption metrics.

These diametrical positions are understandable. However, all of them are imprudent because their adherents focus on only one war while unthinkingly ignoring the rest.

In fact, at least three major wars are going on simultaneously instead of just one. First, the autocratic Russian regime wages undeclared war on Russian citizens. Second, radical left-wingers are in open conflict with the population of the United States. Observing those two wars, a prominent suzerain—the Chinese Communist Party—orchestrated the shooting war between Russia and Ukraine.

It is the same old story: a “clever” left-wing regime cooperates with another not-so-smart left-wing government to implement the New World Order because they realize they cannot make the World Revolution alone. They don’t have the economic or military power to do so. The solution? Make the not-so-clever leftists engage in a prolonged, exhaustive battle with some arbitrary targets. The goal is not to destroy a neighboring or faraway land. The intent is to drain every state involved to the desired degree of weakness. After this, the “clever” leftists will strike the decisive blow, overpowering both ideologically antagonistic states.

If the narration reminds you of something, it should be no surprise—we just described how Stalin stimulated World War II by exploiting no-so-wise Hitler.

How did they do it in the case of Ukraine?

Everybody has heard about the “rights of the Russian-speaking Donbas” (industrial region of the Ukrainian East) and their numerous “violations.” What is calculatedly hidden from the public is the underlying reason why so many ethnic Russians live in Eastern Ukraine.

When Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin used manufactured food crises in 1930s communist-occupied Ukraine, it triggered the Holodomor. (Note it is a standard leftist approach. Currently, China weaponizes food prices globally by using Russia’s hands.) The widespread famine killed millions of Ukrainians—all in an attempt to crush opposition to communist ideas. The residents of primarily agricultural West Ukraine, which had many small farms, had a better chance of survival than the relatively industrialized East Ukraine population.

Ultimately, Stalin decided to repopulate East Ukraine by forcing families from central Russia to relocate to Eastern Ukraine’s wastelands. They quartered Russians in houses by then-murdered Ukrainians and allocated parcels of land. Russians brought their language, culture, and traditions and—in return for handouts from the Soviet government—became loyal servants to the communist powers.

The tensions between cohabitants—native Ukrainians and involuntary “invaders”—had been growing since the 1940s, and even the iron fist of the Soviet dictators could not suppress them. Eventually, the foreseeable but not easily predictable turning point, like a secret intelligence agency (KGB) taking over Russia, set Ukraine on a collision course with China’s client state.

Over the years, both presidents—Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin—have demonstrated unmistakable signs that they are on the Chinese payroll. During a recent press conference in Vietnam, Joe Biden stated, “I don’t want to contain China” and “We’re all better off if China does well.” For his part, Vladimir Putin is solidly in China’s orbit: economically as a junior partner and politically as a vassal.

Per China’s request, both presidents are working tirelessly to impoverish the countries they helm: Russia with war on its neighbor and the United States as Ukraine’s primary weapons and financial supplier. Both are doing Chinese Communists’ bidding, preparing economic, political, and assaultive conditions for Mao’s version of leftism to establish the New World Order. All this while China plays the diplomatic role of peacemaker.

Fortunately, it is not a hot world war yet, but the Russo-Ukrainian War affected countries on all continents. However, the war’s mastermind, the Chinese Communists, cannot assert firm control over rapidly unfolding events. Thus, the sum of unintended consequences greatly outweighs the matters under Chinese management and control.

Chinese Communists may have worked hard to normalize aggression, but they are certainly not the first. The history of leftist actions indicates that they plotted constantly for the World Revolution in one form or another. In other words, the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war should not be considered an isolated incident. This war is just one single line in the overall leftist project plan. Other items from that plan are well-known. Recall the COVID-19 hysteria (even if the virus itself was not intentionally released from the Wuhan lab, the political component of the pandemic is unquestionable). Also consider “climate change” (sorry—it is now called “global burning”) and WEF-promoted ersatz-fascism.

The leftist informational blockade is challenging to break through. The card-carrying ideological foot soldiers have infiltrated media and social networks. They—knowingly and sometimes unknowingly—joined forces with a plethora of “woke” intelligence agencies. Many segments of society are not trained to see the forest behind trees because the description of reality and the corresponding political vocabulary are firmly in the hands of the Left. Like an experienced magician, China shows what it wants the world to perceive while keeping the actual agenda well camouflaged.

Who do you think finances the barbaric invasion of illegals into the West? Who continues to invest in the Soviet-era “Red Cocaine” strategy, but with modern narcotics like fentanyl? Every time leftists feel the chorus of people asking inconvenient questions is exceedingly loud, new, “recently declassified” UFO sightings suddenly appear.

The beneficiaries of the present-day Russo-Ukrainian War are not in Europe or the Americas, Africa, or Australia. The heirs presumptive are China’s Communist Party Politburo; all human beings outside the leftist ecosystem must learn that lesson. The unfortunates of Europe’s most significant military campaign since World War II are easy to spot: Ukrainian, Russian, American, Polish, British, French, and German masses—just to name a few, and most of Africa’s inhabitants.

To conclude, American and Russian presidents are not independent players on the world stage; instead, they are tasked with presiding over the decline. That leaves the Ukrainian president between a rock and a hard place. Ironically, leftist history suggests that the Chinese will soon become victims, too.

[Originally published at American Thinker]