Anti-Semitism of Anti-Humans

Islam has experienced a global decline since the Battle of Vienna in 1683. Instead of waning completely, it underwent two significant advancements in the 20th century: due to the discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia in 1938 and Islam’s coupling with Leftist philosophies, including both Marxist and non-Marxist, which were sparked by the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917.

The profusion of hydrocarbons had a detrimental impact on Muslims, similar to how an excess of any resource can lead to widespread corruption in the community. The tremendous reaches under the sandy dunes have not resulted in happiness, though; they have led to a well-observed retrograde movement. Islamic fundamentalists envision their future as a return to 7th-century societal norms and values.

Put simply, our world is home to two observable groups of humans: one that undergoes evolutionary changes and another that has willingly opted for a road of degeneration. Given the opposing movements of these two notable groups of individuals, it is probable that they will eventually collide and annihilate.

The widely known “clash of civilizations” is not the primary occurrence. This phenomenon merely indicates a more profound underlying process: the complex coexistence of two distinct subspecies of humans, one advancing socially and another regressing socially. To elucidate, while biological evolution (a directionless and brainless endeavor) continues to impact all individuals, societal evolution does not have the same influence. Indeed, certain individuals forge ahead while others march backward.

For example, radical Islam has regressed some societies back to the pre-modern era. Just as positrons (particles of anti-matter) could be interpreted as electrons flowing back in time, as suggested by Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman, fundamentalist Muslims can be perceived as being anti-human.

Thus, the time has come to identify yet another strain of anti-Semitism. In addition to well-known branches, like Left anti-Semitism, Right anti-Semitism, religious anti-Semitism, and racial anti-Semitism, the anti-Semitism of anti-humans occupies a special place. However, if we are talking about anti-Semitism, it is necessary to define this strangeness clearly.

Anti-Semitism manifests animosity toward the superposition of Jewish achievements of the past, present, and future.

Perhaps this hatred is based on envy, but the essence in this definition is not that, but the word “superposition.” That means that anti-Semites, as a rule, do not envy the success of any particular Jew—they resent an aggregate, a collective image of successful abstract Jews of the past, present, and future.

The irrationality of anti-Semitism stems directly from the fact that anti-Semitism projects the timeless global success of Jews—all past, all present, and all future—onto one concrete Jew at a given time, on the Jew whom the pogromists have chosen as their next victim. Furthermore, since among Jews, as among all people, there is a percentage of bitter losers, the above definition of anti-Semitism applies to them as well (Natan Sharansky aptly names these Jewish anti-Semites “un-Jews”).

Note that anti-Semitism is a self-sufficient system of views that no longer require the existence of Jews. For example, the Aztecs are long extinct from the face of the Earth. Any enmity toward them (anti-Aztecism) is over too. Spartans are no longer with us. Animosity toward them, if any, is gone, too. However, if tomorrow the last Jew dies, anti-Semitism will continue. The proof comes from widespread anti-Semitism in countries where practically nobody has ever met a Jew, like China or Pakistan.

Consider another extreme case: a world where everyone is a Jew. Will anti-Semitism fade? The answer is no, unfortunately. The reason behind it is straightforward: anti-Semitism is not a rational anomaly; it is a glaring, irrational idea. It is the most pathetic, absurd, ignorant, and bigoted conception ever concocted.

Jews’ extermination will not eliminate anti-Semitism. Israel’s annihilation will not get rid of anti-Semitism. After dealing with Jews, anti-humans and their avant-garde—the Tunnel Tribe—will proceed with all other “non-believers.” Even after establishing the Notre Dame Mosque in Paris and the Capitol Mosque in Washington, DC, anti-humans will never stop. Do not forget: they are moving back in time, which positions them on a permanent collision course with the rest of humanity. The pattern of anti-humanization will never cease until the obliteration of most—if not all—carriers of anti-humanism.

The range of potential approaches to address the problem is restricted due to its foundation in the metaphysical realm. Taking into account the nonsensical nature of the anti-Semitic ideological universe, logical arguments will not be compelling. Therefore, there are few feasible methods.

In the transcendental domain, an attempt could be made to move Islam away from fundamentalism. In essence, it is a program that cultivates “bad Muslims,” where “bad” is from the fundamentalist interpretation of Islam’s holy books, by convincing them that being “bad Muslim” actually means “good Muslim” for the rest of the planet. It would be Islam’s reformation of sorts, prepared by non-Muslims for Muslims, constructed upon the argument that the rest of the world is already populated by mostly “bad Christians,” “bad Jews,” and “bad Whatever,” where “bad” is bad only from a specific dogma. Being a little “bad” from one’s tribe’s point of view benefits everybody.

The second method involves physically eliminating individuals who propagate backsliding ideologies. The state of Israel does just that. Israelis, including non-Jews, are on the front lines of the planet-wide annihilation of matter and anti-matter, humans and anti-humans. The annihilation parade causes severe damage, complete ruin, and mass murder. The time ahead remains uncertain; however, the coming decades will provide evidence regarding the feasibility of the two commonsensical approaches discussed above.

However, the most promising, long-term approach would be the alternative initiative of geoconservatism.

Anti-Semitism (in its original sense of anti-Jewishness) is not a disease of society; instead, it is a symptom of the unhealthiness of society at large. By refusing to acknowledge anti-Semitism, society denies a sober diagnosis. It guarantees the failure of all attempts to eradicate anti-Semitism because society will concentrate on treating symptoms, not the core problem.

Rather than being a detached episode, anti-Semitism must be considered a coercion tool used by governments. Recall that anti-Jewish pogroms were never spontaneous; instead, they were carefully planned and executed by coercive governments and government-associated institutions. Some institutions that play a crucial role in coercive government coalitions are transcendental in nature, like institutionalized religions. To illustrate, present-day, institutionalized Islam is a government agency with a deity marginally attached.

Contrarily, governance by consent does not need anti-Semitism. The overall evolution of freedom shifts the balance of governance types from coercion to consent. As a result, the number of conservative governments will grow over time, and consequently, anti-Semitism will wither away.

The geoconservatism thesis would render all governments too weak to even think about aggressive or unfriendly moves against their citizens or neighbors. That is utopian, of course, but only to a degree because such a power structure worldwide would constitute a desired stability mechanism. The existence of sufficiently small-scale governments that barely deal with garbage, crime, and highways guarantees freedom. In a genuinely free society, anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism, anti-Israel, and anti-Judaism (these are distinguishable marketing campaigns, different avenues in pursuit of the same goal: the physical eradication of Jews) are obsolete anachronisms.

In other words, the means to defeating anti-Semitism is not the physical elimination of people who fall for it. It is not defeating anti-Semitic countries militarily per se. The key to the ultimate elimination of anti-Semitism is to make this sentiment unprofitable, unneeded, and uncool, which is the direct byproduct of a truly conservative government by consent.

[Originally published at Jihad Watch. This piece is adapted from Gary’s forthcoming book, “Left Imperialism” (Paragon House, 2024)]