Tag: Elections 2020

The reaction to a positive coronavirus test by Donald and Melania Trump is a typical example of mass psychosis associated with the coronavirus.  The fact is that both the President and the First Lady are practically asymptomatic.  They are not sick in the conventional sense of the word, although they could still potentially transmit the virus to somebody else.  They have little or no fever, no headache, or other severe symptoms, but they do have symptoms of a mild cold.  They might develop severe symptoms later on, but at the moment, Trump continues to work as usual, even in the hospital. However, all political rallies scheduled for the coming days have been canceled.

Since the incubation period for coronavirus is roughly 3 to 7 days, Trump is guaranteed to have had the coronavirus during the first presidential debate of 2020.

Thus, Trump is currently the potential carrier of fragments of coronavirus genetic material but is not sick.  The rapid PCR test is based on the detection of viral RNA fragments.  This test was invented by Nobel laureate Kari Mullis and is simply a chain reaction of multiplying RNA fragments.  Most people are familiar with the uranium chain reaction, and PCR is a chain reaction of the synthesis of RNA fragments.

If the test is positive, it means that after 2 to the 37th power of cycles, fragments were found – not even the virus itself, but pieces of its RNA.  This rapid test is not a test to isolate the virus itself – it takes several days to do so.  At this stage, the virus itself has not been detected in Trump, just some fragments of coronavirus RNA have been found.  There are no indications for hospitalization yet because Trump is one of 20% of Americans who had practically no symptoms, but the test still turned out to be positive.

From a political perspective, the news that Trump was diagnosed with the coronavirus has led to very extraordinary consequences.  It immediately became clear that, by analogy with the leaders of Canada, Great Britain, and other countries, who also tested positive for coronavirus, but did not get really sick, Trump’s approval rating would increase.  It will increase because of simple human compassion.

As much as Trump’s political opponents would not like it, some events are perceived by all people equally in all countries, without exception.  Such events are health problems and sexual adventures of the head of state.

Never in the history of mankind have either health problems or sexual adventures have led to a drop in the rating of a politician.  Recall the wounding of Ronald Reagan and the well-known details of the intimate adventures of Charles De Gaulle, John F. Kennedy, Fidel Castro, and Bill Clinton.  And, of course, Donald Trump.

The reaction of leftists in America to this news could have been predicted by anyone, even an Australian aborigine far from American realities.  Leftists are praying for Trump’s death, and they express this desire often, with pleasure, and sincerely.  Trump’s positive test has once again exposed Democrats as malevolent, petty, and short-sighted.  Joe Biden flatly refused to condemn those of his supporters who began openly celebrating the news of Trump’s coronavirus.  But these desires of Democrats, including high-ranking Democrats, are by no means an objective predictor of elections, which are only a month away.  An outspoken desire for the death of one’s political opponent is common, especially among the left.

The main event, which has substantial predictive potential, is the reaction of the global financial markets to Trump’s coronavirus test result.

In the 2016 season, the only objective indicator of political preferences was the exchange rate of the Mexican peso to the US dollar.  The US dollar rose on the eve of the 2016 elections, the Mexican peso fell, and Hillary Clinton’s chances fell along with the peso.

In the 2020 season, financial markets did not show their political preferences in any way – until Trump tweeted the news of a positive test on Thursday night.  The reaction of financial markets worldwide was immediate, violent, and cynical – the markets fell.  They fell not only in America, but they also dropped all over the world.  This reaction – the reaction of voting with your own money – shows which side political preferences are worldwide. 

For all political scientists, such a signal was long-awaited.

On Friday, the financial markets have clearly demonstrated an objective signal – the normalization of the planet’s life after the coronavirus pandemic requires Donald Trump at the head of the United States.

It became clear that any negative news about Trump is perceived negatively by the financial markets, and anything positive about Trump is perceived positively.  Most likely, if Joe Biden also contracts the coronavirus, the financial markets will ignore this event altogether.

All political scientists and commentators have long been waiting for such an objective signal.  The certainty from those who vote with money is good news to everybody who predicts Trump’s victory.  We can only regret that it comes with such a price – the price of health.  But the lion in the White House had overcome many such difficulties, and two-week quarantine shall pass.

[Originally published by Peritum Media]

Реакция на положительный результат теста на коронавирус у Дональда и Мелании Трамп – типичный пример массового психоза, связанного с коронавирусом. Дело в том, что и президент, и первая леди – практически бессимптомные. Они не являются больными в общепринятом понимании этого слова, но потенциально могут передать вирус кому-то другому. У них нет ни высокой температуры, ни головной боли, ни других серьезных симптомов, но имеются симптомы легкой простуды. Трамп продолжает работать в обычном режиме, но запланированные на ближайшие дни политические ралли отменены.

Поскольку инкубационный период для коронавируса примерно от 3 до 7 дней, на первых дебатах сезона 2020 года Трамп уже гарантированно участвовал с коронавирусом.

Таким образом, Трамп в настоящее время является носителем осколков генетического материала коронавируса, но не является больным. Именно на выявлении фрагментов РНК вируса и основан экспресс-тест PCR. Этот тест был придуман Нобелевским лауреатом Кери Маллисом и является просто цепной реакцией размножения фрагментов. Всем хорошо знакома цепная реакция деления урана, а PCR – это цепная реакция синтеза осколков РНК.

Если этот тест – положительный, то это означает, что после 2 в 37-й степени циклов найдены фрагменты – даже не самого вируса, а его РНК. Этот экспресс-тест не является тестом на выделение и изоляцию вируса как такового – для такого теста требуется несколько дней. На данном этапе сам вирус у Трампа не обнаружен, а вот некие осколки РНК коронавируса – обнаружены. Показаний к госпитализации пока нет, потому что Трамп оказался одним из тех 20% американцев, у которых практически не было никаких симптомов, но тест все-таки оказался положительным.

С политической точки зрения новость о том, что у Трампа обнаружен коронавирус, привела к весьма неординарным последствиям. Сразу же стало понятно, что, по аналогии с руководителями Канады, Великобритании и других стран, которые тоже получили положительный тест на коронавирус, но так и не заболели, рейтинг Трампа возрастет. Возрастет из-за простого человеческого сострадания.

Как бы политическим противникам не хотелось, но некоторые события воспринимаются всеми людьми одинаково во всех странах без исключения. Такими событиями являются проблемы со здоровьем и сексуальные приключения главы государства.

Еще никогда в истории человечества ни проблемы со здоровьем, ни сексуальные приключения не привели к падению рейтинга политика. Вспомним ранение Рейгана и широко известные подробности интимных похождений Шарля Де Голля, Джона Кеннеди, Фиделя Кастро, и Билла Клинтона. И, разумеется, того же Дональда Трампа.

Реакцию леваков в Америке на эту новость мог предсказать любой, даже далекий от американских реалий австралийский абориген. Чете Трампов желают смерти, причем высказывают это часто, с удовольствием, и искренне. Сведения о положительном тесте Трампа в очередной раз разоблачило демократов как людей злорадных, мелочных, и недальновидных. Джо Байден категорически отказался осудить тех своих сторонников, которые начали открыто праздновать новость про коронавирус у Трампа. Но эти желания демократов, включая высокопоставленных демократов, никак не являются объективным предсказателем выборов, до которых остался всего месяц. Откровенное желание смерти своего политического противника – явление обыденное, особенно среди левых.

Главным же событием, которое имеет огромный предсказательный потенциал, является реакция мировых финансовых рынков на положительный результат теста у Трампа.

Напомню, что в сезоне 2016 года единственным объективным показателем политических предпочтений был курс мексиканского песо к американскому доллару. Американский доллар накануне выборов 2016 года возрос, а мексиканское песо упало, и вместе с песо упали какие-либо шансы Хиллари Клинтон (подробности описаны в статье «Почему Хиллари упала вместе с мексиканским песо?»)

В сезоне 2020 года финансовые рынки никоим образом не демонстрировали свои политические предпочтения – до того момента, когда Трамп в ночь с четверга на пятницу не сообщил в Твиттере новость о положительном тесте. Реакция финансовых рынков во всем мире была мгновенной, жесткой и циничной – рынки упали. Упали не только в Америке – упали во всем мире. Эта реакция – реакция голосования своими собственными деньгами – показывает, на чьей стороне находятся политические предпочтения во всем мире. Этот сигнал был долгожданным для всех политологов.

Финансовые рынки наглядно продемонстрировали объективный сигнал – нормализация жизни планеты после пандемии коронавируса требует во главе США Дональда Трампа.

Стало понятно, что любой негатив о Трампе воспринимается финансовыми рынками негативно, а любой позитив о Трампе – позитивно. Скорей всего, если Джо Байден тоже получит коронавирус, то финансовые рынки это событие вообще проигнорируют.

Все политологи и комментаторы давно ждали такого объективного сигнала. Определенность от тех, кто голосует деньгами, мне по душе, потому что мои прогнозы подтверждаются. Остается только сожалеть, что достается это такой ценой – ценой здоровья. Но лев в Белом Доме преодолевал и не такие трудности.

То, что произошло на первых президентских дебатах сезона 2020 года, дебатами назвать нельзя. Журналист Крис Уоллес привык брать интервью, вот он и провел интервью. Человеком, у которого бралось интервью, был Дональд Трамп, а интервьюеров на самом деле было двое – Крис Уоллес и Джо Байден. Эти двое – демократы, и они пытались – под видом дебатов – использовать это интервью для политической экзекуции Трампа.

Многие до сих пор этого не поняли, а вот Трамп понял это уже через 4 минуты после начала этих «дебатов». Но Трамп никогда не был и никогда не будет мальчиком для битья, поэтому нападающие Крис и Джо начали получать по зубам уже на 5-й минуте матча.

Кто победил?

Лучший ответ на этот вопрос – это встречный вопрос: «А что считается победой в дебатах?» Однозначного ответа на этот вопрос не существует, потому что два выборных штаба кандидатов преследуют, как правило, две совершенно различные цели. Иногда эти цели совпадают – когда оба претендента на должность президента эту должность не занимают. Примером являются дебаты Трамп-Клинтон в 2016 году. Но если одна из сторон занимает этот пост – как его сейчас занимает Трамп – то задачи сторон не только совершенно разные, но и совершенно предсказуемые.

Задача кампании Байдена, как и любого другого, кто борется с нынешним обитателем Белого Дома – смешать его с грязью. Именно поэтому сообщник Байдена Крис Уоллес перебивал президента Трампа 76 раз за 90 минут. Именно поэтому Крис Уоллес предпочитал не останавливать Байдена, когда Трамп что-то говорил. Тем самым создавалась ситуация, когда точка зрения Трампа преднамеренно заглушалась. Иногда слов Байдена было недостаточно, и Крис приходил Джо на помощь. Тогда мы слышали всех троих одновременно.

Многие остались недовольны этим моментом, и некоторые даже прилагают эпитет «хаос» для описания первых дебатов Трампа и Байдена. Но это был не природный, а искусственный хаос. Хаос как метод исполнения поставленной демократами задачи. Хаос как способ исполнения стратегического приказа. Добавим к э тому хорошо организованные демократами погромы в демократических анклавах. Эти погромы только на поверхности выглядели как хаос.

К сентябрю 2020 года произошла полная швондеризация как стратегии, так и тактики демократов.

(Кстати, поведение Криса Уоллеса, похоже, будет означать конец его карьеры в недалеком будущем. Он умудрился спросить Трампа один и тот же вопрос о белых супрематистах дважды – и на дебатах 2016 года, и на дебатах 2020 года. С точки зрения журналистики делать подобное – просто глупо, а вот с точки зрения выборного штаба Байдена это имеет смысл – чем больше таких вопросов, тем меньше времени останется у Трампа рассказать о своих достижениях).

А какова была задача Трампа на первых дебатах?

Задачей Трампа было разрушение левой коалиции, которая стоит за Байденом, и, как результат, отторжение избирателей Байдена от Байдена.

Именно Трамп заставил недалекого Байдена в пылу дискуссии совершить непростительные (с точки зрения левых) стратегические ошибки и оговорки. Во-первых, Байден проговорился о том, что его план о здравоохранении оставит в силе частные страховые медицинские компании. Для левых такие высказывания равносильны анафеме, потому что конечным результатом, с их точки зрения, должна быть только полная национализация здравоохранения.

Во-вторых, Байден осмелился публично отказаться от Нового Зеленого Курса, и тем самым оказался на грани отлучения от религиозного культа глобального потепления.

В-третьих, Байден при обсуждении налоговых деклараций Трампа допустил досадную оговорку, которая, скорей всего, принесет ему немало сюрпризов в будущем. В тот момент, когда Крис Уоллес давил на Трампа, чтобы тот обнародовал свои налоговые декларации, Байден нажал на Трампа со своей стороны: «Когда, иншаллах?»

То есть Байден на телевизионных дебатах фактически сказал: «Да будет на то воля Аллаха!»

В-четвертых, Байден отказался от идеи-фикс демократов о прекращении финансирования полиции, и призвал своих сторонников отказаться от погромов. В результате многие, очень многие левые после первых дебатов разочаровались в Байдене.

Добился ли Трамп своей цели? Ответ дает статистика посещения его предвыборного митинга на следующий же день после первых дебатов. В Миннесоте состав участников ралли был таков – 60% были не республиканцами, 20% были демократами, 17% не голосовали в 2016 году, а 8% вообще не голосовали в четырех последних президентских выборах. Цифры эти для штаба Байдена являются аналогом политической высшей меры наказания.

Рейтинг первых дебатов Трампа и Байдена резко упал по сравнению с 2016 годом. Первые дебаты сезона 2016 года смотрели 84 миллиона американцев, а первые дебаты сезона 2020 года заинтересовали лишь 27 миллионов человек. Что изменилось? Изменился лишь один участник, а другой остался прежним – Трамп. Место Хиллари Клинтон в 2020 году занял Джо Байден. Рейтинг дебатов упал на 2/3, потому что большинство американцев уже давно сделали свой выбор. Они знают, что Джо Байден – гораздо более слабый политический противник, чем Хиллари Клинтон, а Трамп-2020 политически гораздо сильнее Трампа-2016.

Американские граждане прекрасно знают, кто выйдет победителем, поэтому решили не терять времени зря, и проигнорировали дебаты. Если эта теория правильная, вторые дебаты должны иметь еще более низкий рейтинг.

Сразу же после первых дебатов Комиссия по дебатам тут же предложила изменить протокол. Вдобавок к этому, Нэнси Пелоси потребовала прекратить все последующие дебаты. Стали бы демократы менять коней на переправе, если бы их стратегия оказалась успешной?

Демократы всегда были безжалостны и беспощадны к врагам Социалистического Рейха. До 2016 года многое, практически все сходило им с рук. Они в большинстве случаев добивались своего – даже тогда, когда они были партией меньшинства в Конгрессе.

В 2016 году на сцену вышел Дональд Трамп – не менее безжалостный и не менее беспощадный к своим противникам. Неужели вы думаете, что если демократы забыли об импичменте, то Трамп об этом забыл? Неужели вы думаете, что если демократы забыли о том, что администрация Обамы шпионила за Трампом, то Трамп об этом забыл? (Последние сводки на этом фронте таковы: агент ФБР Питер Строк в своей новой книге «Скомпрометированный» утверждает, что Путин передает Трампу приказы … телепатически. Оставим этот момент без комментариев).

Трамп-2016, созданный демократами и прикормленными журналистами, не должен был победить, и не мог победить. Это был монстр, тупой нарцисс, насильник, предатель интересов Демократической партии, и агент Путина.

Проблема заключается в том, что этот Трамп-дегенерат существовал только в головах сторонников Хиллари Клинтон.

Американский народ в 2016 году избрал реального Трампа, а не его карикатурный образ.

Демократы отказались признать тот факт, что фальшивый Трамп победил, и здесь они правы – он и не победил. Они были шокированы победой фальшивого Трампа, который жил только у них в головах. Победил же реальный Дональд Трамп.

Первые дебаты 2020 года показали, что пощады демократам не будет. Трамп-2020 пошел в атаку на 5-й минуте матча, и парировал все без исключения нападки от обоих демократов. Демократы привыкли к тому, что республиканцы – это неповоротливый слон, и его можно кусать и грызть бесконечно. Но Трамп трансформировал не только Республиканскую партию, но и их символ. Трамп научил республиканцев, как надо побеждать.

В 2020 году демократическому ослу приходится иметь дело не с толстокожим слоном, а с оскорбленным львом.

In 1933, Hermann Goering was appointed Minister of the Interior (i.e., Police Commissioner) of Prussia.  One of Goering’s first innovations was a radical change in the priorities of police, including specific restrictions of police activities.  The novelty of Goering’s approach was that he departed from the socialist tradition of demanding the abolition of the police, which was first proposed by Vladimir Lenin a quarter of a century before the described events in his article “April Theses” of 1917.

Another radical proposal of Russian socialists – the closure of prisons and the release of all prisoners – has been partially implemented by some American Democrat Governors a hundred years later.  In the spring of 2020, a massive number of criminals were released from local (non-Federal) prisons – allegedly due to the coronavirus – who then went on to make a significant contribution to pogroms, looting, and riots.

Minister Goering’s first step was staging a grand purge of the police and hiring National Socialist Party activists with no police experience to replace the thousands of dismissed policemen.  How could the head of police practically leave citizens to their fate without police protection? This seems more than strange, but Goering had a different task.

The fact is that by that time, the Nazis had already created alternative police, which was subordinate only to the party – the so-called SA (Sturmabteilung).  The SA stormtroopers wore light brown uniforms.  This uniform was bought by the party of German National Socialists – the NSDAP – at a bargain price from the German army, which kept in its warehouses millions of units of these clothes, prepared for Germany’s invasion of Africa during the First World War.  The invasion never took place, and the army was glad to get rid of unnecessary uniforms.

The stormtroopers of the National Socialist Party, the SA, went down in history as the Brownshirts.

As Minister of the Interior, Hermann Goering ordered the Prussian State police to work in parallel with the police of the National Socialist Party.

Soon this approach was extended to the entire Third Reich.  The task of the Brownshirts was not to protect law and order but to organize riots, pogroms, arson, and intimidation of opponents of the National Socialist ideology to strengthen their political power.

In parallel with the radical reform of the police, a process of radical control over firearms began in Germany – at first, in 1933, it was only about the registration of military-grade weapons, and then it was time to register any gun.  In 1935 and 1938, Germany adopted laws on the total confiscation of firearms from all “unreliable elements” (Jews, for example).  At the same time, all restrictions were lifted on weapons for members of the NSDAP and related organizations (such as the Hitler Youth).

As a result, the main task of the German state police was not to protect citizens but to protect the rioters.

Democrat mobsters imitate the Nazi Brownshirts in many ways, although in some ways they differ.  Today’s leftists decided to emulate the Blackshirts of the Italian socialist Mussolini (in clothing choice), the Brownshirts of the German National Socialists (in their methods of terror), and the Maoist Hongweibing (in ideological stubbornness).  Blackshirts, Brownshirts, and Hongweibing are ancient practices of global leftist movements.  In other words, in 2020, neither leftist philosophy nor the current generation of leftists in America could come up with anything new.

Calls for the dissolution of the police or defunding of police are attempts by Democrats to transform the police from a law enforcement agency into a rioters’ protection agency.

The irony of history is that a year later, in 1934, the leadership of the Brownshirts led by Ernst Röhm was eradicated (the official code name for this operation was “Operation Hummingbird,” but it went down in history as the “Night of the Long Knives”).  Who eliminated the SA leaders, all of whom were loyal supporters of National Socialism? This was done by their party comrades, SS Stormtroopers, and the word “comrades” is the most acceptable here.  The fact is that, according to the tradition established among all socialists, members of the SS called themselves that way (for example, “Comrade Sturmbannfuehrer,” not “Herr Sturmbannfuehrer”).

The same fate awaits the American democrat goons, although, at present, no one can predict precisely how the reprisals against these leftist militants will take place.  Only one thing is known – the reprisals against these Democrats will be carried out by the Democrats themselves as part of an internal power struggle.  In the same way, Maximilian Robespierre, one of the founders of the leftist ideological terror, fell under the guillotine at the hands of his fellow revolutionaries.

If the SA militants in Germany were replaced by the SS militants in 1934, then someone else will replace the white Antifa stormtroopers, and black BLM stormtroopers for there are enough left-wing terrorist organizations in America.  Perhaps the go-ahead for the internal crackdown against Antifa and BLM will be given immediately after Biden’s loss on November 3 this year.

From a Machiavellian standpoint, the Democrat Party thugs – Antifa and BLM – are simply an extraordinary political gift.  Who needs agent-provocateurs if your political opponent has such renegades? Do not forget that the primary damage from democratic pogroms falls solely on the democratic states and democratic enclaves.  For months now, the “peaceful democratic rioters” have been dragging the model of the “peaceful guillotine” around the democratic enclaves.

As a result, the new symbol of the Democrat Party of America has become not just a donkey, but a donkey carrying a guillotine.

It is unlikely that any vacillating Republicans or other indecisive voters would dare to associate themselves with such a party.

It took Biden three months to formulate and present his opinion on the subject.  Portland has been burning for three months, and finally, Joe Biden made a statement in which he did not condemn – no – he just chided his supporters for “unnecessary violence.” Biden basically said that you guys are doing noble work, but still, the destruction of capitalism should not take such overt forms.  Biden believes that burning entire city blocks to the ground is overkill.  It took a person who positions himself as the future leader of the free world three whole months to come to this conclusion.  Anyone, even a person who is very far from politics, understands that this is just a mockery of common sense. 

It is an admission that Biden did not, does not, and will never have leadership skills.

Only a complete political dilettante does not understand that by the end of summer 2020, the political train to Washington has already left the station.  To jump on the last wagon, Biden had three months to harshly condemn the rioters, as Donald Trump did.  Biden missed this opportunity, and now the Democrats will be inevitably defeated in two months.

After the defeat, an intraspecific massacre among Democrats will begin, which the history of America has not yet seen.

[Originally published at Frontpage Magazine]

In August 2020, I had just one wish – that the Democrat Party Convention would continue for at least for another month. The fact is that the Zoom-convention of the leftists consistently gave Trump a one percent rating boost every day that it continued.

Why? Because by August, Americans finally learned what socialism smells like. It smells like the fumes of burnt cars, burned down/looted businesses and houses. It smells like Molotov cocktails, police blood, and hospital rooms. In other words, Americans felt well that American socialism smells just like any other socialism – like garbage and filth.

After the Convention, the Democrats suddenly discovered that their ratings had dropped because none of them had ever bothered to condemn the “peaceful” arsonists, “peaceful” hooligans, and “peaceful” looters in four days. They immediately called for an end to the pogroms, but it was too late. By the end of summer 2020, the word “thug” had long become synonymous with the word “democrat,” and now leftists will have to work for decades to convince American citizens otherwise.

The Democrat Convention was a convention of leftist conspirators who have long made no secret of their goal of destroying America. The Republican Convention was a convention of patriots, who also make no secret of their pursuit of American prosperity. The Democrat bunch was boring, and the enthusiasm level was about zero. The Republican Convention was encouraging, and the level of enthusiasm was off the charts. Whereas the Democratic Convention described America in dark, depressing, and vicious terms, the Republican Convention saw America’s future as bright, prosperous, and optimistic.

The inexperienced revolutionary Kamala Harris said that the riots inspired by the Democrats would not end under any conditions – neither before nor after the elections. Thank you, Madame Commissar! The candidacy of a vice president like you will definitely help the election campaign – not Biden, but Trump.

Currently, the riots are happening strictly in democratic enclaves. The mayor of Portland has officially turned down help offered by President Trump. To be honest, I did not expect the mayor of Portland, communist Ted Wheeler, to make such an impressive contribution to Trump’s campaign. Thank you, Commissar Wheeler!

Democrats sanctioned the destruction of several American cities in the hope that their inhabitants would be so dumb that they would vote for the Democrats because of the pogroms. I wonder if any of them estimate how many votes each burned car and each looted store brings to Biden? How many votes do these actions bring into Trump’s camp?

Democrats continue to make one stupid mistake after another with enviable persistence. For example, they not only inspired violence and pogroms, but they openly supported them. Then, when the ersatz revolutionaries failed to achieve results, they blamed Trump for the pogroms. At the same time, no one (I emphasize – no one) can say the name of the Republican mayor, in whose city mass “peaceful riots” are taking place.

By now, our country has had the opportunity to preview the vernissage of socialism with a Chinese face on American soil.

Antifa and BLM are working overtime to alienate as many voters as possible from the Democrats. Both white Antifa and black BLM are working hard to shrink the Democratic electoral base. We should say a most sincere thank you to the Antifa and BLM militants from the grateful citizens of the United States. The anti-American antics of American goons in the summer of 2020 have significantly boosted the ranks of Trump’s supporters.

The main difference between the pogroms of 2020 and the pogroms of the 60s and 70s is their funding source. If in the 20^th century, the Soviet communists were the sponsors of the riots, in the 21^st century, the Chinese communists are. Another difference is that protests and violence in the 20^th century were widespread. Today, only the coverage of these events by means of mass disinformation media is ubiquitous, but the pogroms themselves are limited only to those cities in which the mayors are die-hard communists.

Finally, the protests of the 60s took place under the mantras of Peace, Love, and Drugs. Today the slogans of the rioters are different – Violence, Hatred, and Drugs.

We know that among the democrat-pogrom-mongers, there are criminals and the mentally ill, and simply sadists and maniacs, but these categories of “peaceful pogrom-mongers” do not have an ideological component, and they have no organizational structure. There are two categories of thugs who are drugged with bloody ideology – Antifa and BLM. Both were created by the communists, but here it is necessary to clarify that they are supporters of one very influential branch of communism – Maoism.

In other words, the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party plays a decisive role in the bloody unrest in America’s democrat enclaves.

Homegrown American hongweibing are trying to inject their virtual ideas and virtual utopias into real America. The generation that grew up with virtual video games has never experienced pain, and they simply do not understand why, in response to a brick or a Molotov cocktail, they receive a blow from a policeman with a truncheon, after which they cannot recover for several weeks. After all, this should not be so – in video games, they beat you, they even kill you, but after a second, you jump to your feet, as if nothing had happened. There is no pain or frustration; there is only a desire to win.

America has met on its way those who want to win without taking their ass off the couch. But the political spectacle is coming to an end, and it is time for the exalted kids to return to their unfinished video games.

Of course, being a communist in a free country like America is safe, enjoyable, and fashionable. Unfortunately, American hongweibing cannot even imagine what it would be like to be a free person in a communist country. The Democrats went all-in and decided to sacrifice American youth to the communist utopia.

The thugs made a habit of carrying with them a model of a guillotine (more precisely, a “peaceful guillotine”), and they are delighted at the sight of a Trump dummy having its head cut clean off. Angela Davis, a communist, known since Soviet times, recently announced that the pogroms of 2020 are “a rehearsal for the revolution.” Of course, the Chinese curators of the ersatz revolutionaries did not tell these ignoramuses anything about another leftist revolution – in France – and about who exactly suffered from it the most.

As it is known, supporters of utopian left ideas, all without exception, were decapitated during the French Revolution. It has become a tradition, and the process of annihilation of the previous generation of leftists by the new generation of leftists has become permanent.

By now, the Democrat Party has transformed into a political Chronos, which, according to tradition, will soon begin to devour its own children.

There is not long to wait – just two months.

[Originally published at NOQ Report]

What was the central theme of the 2016 election? Illegal immigration.

What is the central theme of the 2020 election? The safety of American citizens.

I was able to predict the results of the 2016 elections based on the exchange rate of the Mexican peso against the US dollar. The fact is that, in 2016, it was the only objective indicator of how strong political support for Trump was. If his chances were higher than those of Hillary Clinton, the peso should have fallen against the dollar. If his chances were slim, then the dollar should have fallen against the Mexican peso. The peso fell, and Trump won (in that order).

This year, no one even raises the issue of illegal immigration. The wall on the border with Mexico is being built, and it is being constructed quite quickly. The Mexican gangs have basically been expelled from the United States. Due to the high post-coronavirus unemployment rate among American citizens, nobody cares about the fate of illegal immigrants anymore.

Pogroms, arson, vandalism, murders in a dozen democratic enclaves – this is what the American citizens are concerned with now. Is there any objective indicator of what the exact preferences of American citizens are? An index like the Mexican peso in 2016 that would serve as an accurate gauge of political inclinations in 2020?

Before presenting such an objective indicator, consider the behavior of Trump’s political opponents. What are they doing? Do they condemn the violence on the streets of American cities? No. Do they arrest the rioters? No. Instead, they made an attempt to open a criminal case against those who defend their homes from rioters with weapons in their hands. Most Democrat enclaves mass-released inveterate, recidivist criminals from local prisons under the pretext of coronavirus or are closing prisons altogether. In addition, these unabashed Marxists are demanding that President Trump withdraws federal law enforcement personnel from their cities.

Many Democrat mayors not only demonstrate all-round assistance to the belligerent rioters but also provide government support to the homegrown Hongwei Bing. Moreover, some of them turned out to be simply impudent. They demanded that the federal government compensate them for the losses from the Democrat-sanctioned pogroms, reducing the budgets of the city police, and doing nothing to protect cities and private property. However, as soon as Trump turned them down, all sorts of “autonomous zones” quickly disappeared from all Democrat enclaves, and the overthrow of monuments practically stopped – the mayors-instigators of the riots quickly realized that they had lost this round.

Does this mean that they will abandon their failed anti-Trump policies? Everyone understands that Democrat mayors will never voluntarily give up their anti-American activities. They will continue to stir up fear and panic – it comes easy for them because the mass disinformation media is on their side. They, like Democrat governors, can be deprived of pandering to red terror only through re-elections. Moreover, perhaps this is the only way out of this situation because many Democrat mayors have practically lost control over their cities.

Residents of particularly affected cities such as New York are leaving them en masse. Recently, real estate agents have noted a strange, but nevertheless widespread phenomenon – New Yorkers buy houses both near New York City – in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and far away – in Montana and South Dakota, and they buy them sight-unseen. Many homes got bids from several dozen desperate New Yorkers at once, and prices, of course, go up.

Many Americans are well aware that in their cities, the power belongs not just to leftists, not only to outspoken communists but also fanatics, ideological whackos with ideas of the world revolution. What will American citizens do? They, in fact, have already done, and have already decided this.

America has gorged its fill of decapitated and mutilated statues, looting and marauding left-wing barbarians, and demands the restoration of order. Democrats already seem to know who won this year’s election, and the pathetic attempt to revolutionize America is simply an instinctive collective reaction of leftism to its future loss.

But what can act as a precise, objective measure of this loss?

Go to many stores in America, and you will see empty shelves. The situation is reminiscent of empty store shelves in the Soviet Union. Of course, this does not apply to clothe or food stores – the shelves there are packed to capacity as if nothing were happening.

In America, only gun shops have empty shelves.

Scarcity is a word practically unknown to the Americans, but well known to everyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain. Now there is a deficit in America too – supply does not keep pace with demand for firearms. In the first half of this year, weapons sales grew 80% compared to the first half of 2019, with about half of these purchases made by first-time buyers.

Most importantly, women have made a record number of gun purchases this year.

Even if an American citizen has enough weapons to defend himself, and doesn’t need to buy anything, it is challenging to find the time to go to a shooting range. Everything is booked for weeks in advance, and it is possible to sign up for a gun instructor or weapons trainer only after a few months. In some gun stores, the registration in the queue for the purchase of any weapon is already underway for 2021 – but only for those who pay for the purchase right now.

Empty gun shelves mean Americans are ready to fill the power vacuum and prevent the violence spilling over from several Democrat enclaves to the rest of the United States.

Americans are shocked by the stupidity of their helpless progressive mayors and governors. This, firstly, confirms the thesis that the central theme of this year’s elections is security. American women, as it turned out, for a hundred years supported left feminism (however, science does not know “right feminism”) only in words. Most American women all this time, as it turns out, worried only about what all women in the history of mankind were worried about – for the safety of their families and their children.

Secondly, the thesis that the Democrats will face in the November an angry mass of well-armed American women who have decided to take justice and the fate of the country into their own hands is also confirmed. They will face an army of those who, for millennia, have been ready to tear to pieces anyone who encroaches on the lives of their babies. Democrats should also be reminded that, as a rule, behind each of these women, there is a man who will under no circumstances allow anything wrong to happen to his woman.

Since prehistoric times, women have been given the role of those who reduce the entropy of human society – both at the level of the family and the level of the entire community. Now, less than 100 days before the elections, there are all signs that the American women are getting down to business seriously – they are ready to stop sliding the country into chaos.

Of course, all of the above is a blatant violation of politically correct norms; still, at present, I do not see the force that can change the behavior of American mothers (and thus the results of this year’s elections).

Since the 1964 elections, the number of female voters in America has outnumbered male voters in all presidential elections (the percentage of women voting is roughly between 60% and 65%). What are the remaining 35% -40% of American women who usually don’t vote, doing right now? Even if only every tenth of them a) bought a weapon and b) will vote, the Democrats in about 100 days will face a deafening defeat.

[Originally Published at NOQ Report]